Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
QUESTION: Can funds received by the City of Tamarac pursuant to s. 336.59, F.S., (taxes for road and bridge purposes) be used to repair and maintain traffic control lights and street lights on municipal roads and streets?
SUMMARY: Funds received by the City of Tamarac pursuant to s. 336.59(2), F.S., may be used to maintain and repair existing traffic control lights, street lights, and appurtenant structures which are annexed to and an integral part of municipally maintained roads and streets within the purview of and pursuant to s. 336.59. Such funds may not be used by the city to purchase,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pedersen v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Hanbury v. TunnicliffeSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Gasson v. GaySupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. HezelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Beal v. Erie Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.