Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Hanbury v. Tunnicliffe
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided October 18, 1929PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStrum, J.
This is a proceeding by mandamus, a case of original jurisdiction.
From the allegations of the alternative writ it appears that on June 28,1926, Commercial Bank & Trust Company, a State bank, having its principal office and doing a banking business in West Palm Beach, Florida, “closed its doors and ceased to do business as a banking corporation. ’ ’
When the bank closed, the relator, Annie B. Hanbury, was a depositor therein,, there being a balance due her upon an open checking account.
On November 29, 1926, respondent; W. H. Tunnicliffe, was appointed receiver of said bank by the Comptroller,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- State v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- Bushnell v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Curry v. LehmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Stewart v. DeLand-Lake Helen Special Road & Bridge DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Blankfeld v. Richmond Health Care, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Florida State Racing Commission v. BourquardezSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
- Weber v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.