Legal Opinion

Rodenstein v. Board of Appeal of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 10, 1958PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

This is a bill in equity filed in the Superior Court by way of appeal under the zoning law of Boston, St. 1924, c. 488, § 19, as appearing in St. 1941, c. 373, § 18, from a decision of the board of appeal granting a variance to permit the parking of thirty pleasure automobiles for a fee in a residential district upon certain conditions imposed by the board. A judge of the Superior Court heard the case de nova and found that the variance duly authorized and voted by the board of appeal was warranted. A final decree was entered that the decision of the board of appeal was within its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norcross v. Board of Appeal of Building DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Prusik v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Tanzilli v. CasassaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Hammond v. Board of Appeal of the Building DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Marashlian v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Dion v. Board of Appeals of WalthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Damaskos v. Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals of DuxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Broderick v. Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API