Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Southern California Pipe Trades District Council No. 16 of United Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 25, 1971No. Nos. 26570, 26572PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM M. BYRNE, District Judge:
During its contractual negotiations with Aero Plumbing Company (the Company) the Southern California Pipe Trades District No. 16 of the United Association (the District Council) insisted the collective bargaining agreement include provisos for (1) the posting of a performance bond by the Company, (2) the appointment of the Plumbing-Heating and Piping Employers Council of Southern California, Inc. (the Employers Council) as the Company’s agent for the purpose of collective bargaining and adjustment of grievances, (3) the payment of money to an industry…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borgwarner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- H. K. Porter Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- National Labor Relations Board v. Rockaway News Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Harold W. Hinson, D/B/A Hen House Market No. 3 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Southern California Pipe Trades District Council No. 16 of the United Association, and the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Afl-Cio, Local Union No. 280, National Labor Relations Board v. Southern California Pipe Trades District Council No. 16 of the United AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Kirlew v. Golden Nugget Lake Charles L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2022