Legal Opinion

Clay v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided July 27, 1999No. 2227971PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion

*257UPON A REHEARING EN BANC

LEMONS, Judge.

By opinion dated December 15, 1998, a divided panel of this Court reversed Phillip Clay’s convictions of robbery and use of a firearm in the commission of robbery. On the Commonwealth’s motion, we stayed the mandate of that decision and granted a rehearing en banc. Upon rehearing en banc, the Court’s December 15, 1998 opinion is withdrawn, the mandate is vacated, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court for the reasons set forth below.

I. FACTS

On November 17, 1996, William Vandegrift and Jason Guise were walking from a grocery store to Vandegrift’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cheng v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  2. King v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  3. Pierce v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  4. Falden v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  5. Jordan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Seaton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  2. Borchardt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Clarke v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  4. Tibbs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  5. Anderson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API