Legal Opinion

Merom Gravel Co. v. Pearson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1904No. 4,637PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Sullivan Circuit Court; W. R. Nesbit, Special Judge. Proceeding by James J. Pearson and others to establish a highway. The Merom Gravel Company filed objections. From a judgment establishing the highway the objector appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

Appellees petitioned the board of commissioners of Sullivan county, at their May term, 1901, for the establishment of a highway in said county. Viewers were appointed, and at the June term reported in favor thereof. Appellant thereupon objected to the report for these reasons: (1) That it “does not show that said viewers proceeded to lay out and mark said highway upon any ground anywhere;” (2) that when said report was filed, it “contained no description whatever, but the said report has been changed by some one in the absence of said viewers so as to include a description which was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Denton v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Trittipo v. BeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Sidener v. EssexIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Blemel v. ShattuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Mossman v. ForrestIndiana Supreme Court · 1866

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StephensonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Kreitlein v. FergerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Sisson v. CarithersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API