Legal Opinion
Kingsepp v. Wesleyan University
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 2, 1991No. 89 Civ. 6121 (DNE)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Defendants Wesleyan University (“Wesleyan”), The President and Trustees of Williams College (“Williams”), and the Trustees of Dartmouth College (“Dartmouth”) have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(3) to dismiss this putative class action antitrust case against them on the. grounds that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction and that venue is improper, and, in the alternative, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.-§ 1406 to transfer this action to a district in which it could have been brought. For the following reasons, defendants…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- McGowan v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hsin Ten Enterprise USA, Inc. v. Clark EnterprisesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Sun Forest Corp. v. ShviliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- In Re Triton Ltd. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1999
- Mediators, Inc. v. Manney (In Re the Mediators, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.