Legal Opinion

Lee v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1927No. 18020PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. “When one owning real estate dies, the title to the real estate passes to the heirs; and it is not.the duty of"the administrator, as such, to collect rents accruing after, the death of the intestate; and if he does so, it is not in his capacity as administrator.” Hoyt v. Ware, 156 Ga. 98 (6) (118 S. E. 734); Roberts v. Kite, 33 Ga. App. 91 (125 S. E. 719), and cases cited. An administrator can not interfere with the realty except to protect it or to take possession and sell it to pay debts and for distribution. “He is appointed for the purpose of collecting and talcing care of the effects…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collins v. HenrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Hoyt v. WareSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Autrey v. AutreySupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. Cross v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Roberts v. KiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. HoustonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Zeagler v. ZeaglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Hefner v. Fulton Bag & Cotton MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Stanton v. GaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API