Legal Opinion

Ockerman v. King County Department of Developmental & Environmental Services

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 28, 2000No. 44889-7-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

—At issue is whether the public records portion of the public disclosure act1 requires an agency to provide an explanation of its estimate of time to respond to a records request where the records are not provided within five days of the request. We must also decide whether the manner of providing the records in this case violated the statute.

We hold that RCW 42.17.320 does not require an agency to provide a written explanation of its reasonable estimate of time when it does not provide the records within five days of the request. We also hold that the manner of providing the records in this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. FontanillaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. McCrawWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Kreidler v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Food Services of America v. Royal Heights, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rental Housing Ass'n v. City of Des MoinesWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. RENTAL HOUSING ASS'N v. City of Des MoinesWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Prison Legal News, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Zink v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Andrews v. Washington State PatrolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API