Ludlow Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Knight
Supreme Court of Vermont
Assumpsit. Heard on the report of a commissioner npon the disclosure of the trustees and the trustees’ exceptions thereto in vacation after the December Term, 1916, Windsor County, Waterman, J., presiding. Judgment that the trustees were chargeable and overruling their exceptions to the report. The trustees excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
The Stuarts were adjudged chargeable as trustees in this suit and bring exceptions.
Our statute provides that if a person summoned as a trustee has in his possession goods, effects or credits of the defendant, which he holds by a conveyance or title void as to the creditors of. the defendant, he may be adjudged a trustee on account thereof, although the defendant could not have maintained an action therefor. P. S. 1723.
July 22, 1915, the principal defendant, Charles H. Knight, conveyed to the trustees certain real estate, and personal property connected therewith, for the consideration of his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Davidson v. BurkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Church v. ChapinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
- Crane v. SticklesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
- Wilson v. SpearSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
- Lynch's Admr. v. MurraySupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Becker v. BeckerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Lowell-Woodward Hardware Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Westminster Savings Bank v. SaubleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Matter of Mae Disorda SavageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.