Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Phillips v. Republic Financial Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 2, 2015No. Nos. 5D13-3170, 5D 13-3174Published

1Concurrence

LAWSON, J.,

specially concurring.

I agree that a disputed issue of material fact exists with regard to whether the painted-over skylight was a latent defect. See, e.g., Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc. v. Four Seasons Commercial Maint., Inc., 891 So.2d 1160, 1161 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (“Where a jury could find from the evidence that a defect is latent, summary judgment should not be entered.” (citation omitted)). Appellees argue that the nature of the defect was patent because the injured contractor could have discovered it had he exercised reasonable care. See, e.g., Kala Invs., Inc. v. Sklar,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gasparini v. PordomingoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. Kala Investments, Inc. v. SklarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Bovis v. 7-Eleven, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Brown v. Suncharm Ranch, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc. v. Four Seasons Commercial Maintenance Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API