Legal Opinion
Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc. v. Four Seasons Commercial Maintenance Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 26, 2005No. 4D03-4610PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
A customer of The Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc. (Pep Boys) was injured in a trip and fall accident, allegedly caused by a nail protruding from an asphalt parking lot. Three months earlier, protective “parking bollards” were installed in that area as a barrier between cars and the Pep Boys building. Four Seasons Commercial Maintenance, Inc. and Ferrari Construction Co., Inc. (the contractor) performed the installation. The complaint assumes *1161that the nail was a defect resulting from the installation of the “parking bollards.”
The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the contractor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moore v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Slavin v. KaySupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Kala Investments, Inc. v. SklarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Albelo v. Southern BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Easterday v. MasielloSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barbara Rustowicz v. North Broward Hospital District n/k/a Broward HealthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Phillips v. Republic Financial Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015