Legal Opinion

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1917No. 4764Published

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotteral, Judge. Action by the United States against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railway Company. There was a judgment for the United States, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

MUNGER, District Judge.

The United States, hereafter called plaintiff, brought an action against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railway Company, hereafter called defendant, for violation of the Hours of Service Law (34 Stat. 1415, 8 U. S. Comp. Stats. Ann. §§ 8677-8680).

[1] There were six counts in the petition. The case was submitted to a jury on the issues as to the first five counts, and a verdict was found in favor of the plaintiff on each of these counts, and a verdict was also returned in favor of the plaintiff on the sixth count, by direction of the court. In each of the first five…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  2. United States v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1911
  3. United States v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  4. United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
  5. United States v. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API