Bauer v. Commercial Credit Co.

(dissenting) — The prevailing opinion is inconsistent within itself.

After stating, and reiterating, that respondent, at all the times concerned, had full title to the car, free from any lien or incumbrance; that the car was placed in the hands of the motor company by respondent for sale, and not for borrowing purposes (which made the motor company the broker, factor, or sales agent of respondent); that the evidence conclusively establishes the transaction between appellant and the motor company to have been a loan and not a sale; that all transactions respecting the car, after respondent gave…