Legal Opinion
McMullan v. Hoffman
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon
Decided August 26, 1895No. 2,204PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELLIXGER, District Judge.
The questions in this case for decision arise upon exceptions to the answer of Hoffman. .The suit is upon a written contract between the parties, by which they agreed to share equally in a certain contract, for the construction of the Bull Run pipe line, entered into between the'city of Portland and the defendant.
The complaint alleges that prior to March 6, 3892, the city of Portland, through its water committee, invited bids for the construction of a system of waterworks; that, before the time within which bids were to bo received for such work, it was agreed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Coppell v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hoffman v. McMullenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Camors-McConnell Co. v. McConnellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · 1905
- McMullen v. HoffmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1896
- Finley Method Co. v. Standard Asphalt Co. of Florida, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932