Legal Opinion

Gordon v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1987PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The central question on this appeal is whether the City satisfied its duty of care to plaintiff, while in custody, to protect him from self-inflicted harm. Both parties acknowledge that a duty of care is owed by prison authorities with respect to the health and safety of their charges (see, e.g., O’Grady v City of Fulton, 4 NY2d 717, affg 4 AD2d 743). When prison authorities know or should know that a prisoner has suicidal tendencies or that a prisoner might physically harm himself, a duty arises…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Danielenko v. Kinney Rent a Car, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Hirsh v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. O'Grady v. City of FultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. O'Grady v. City of FultonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Belbachir v. County of McHenryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Colarusso v. DunneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Joseph v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hare v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API