American Oil Co. v. McCluskey
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
Since there is one issue on which a majority of this court are agreed that there must be a reversal, and since there is likelihood that the deficiency in proof concerning the number of employees which the company had on the date of the incident will be supplied on another trial, bringing it within the ruling of the Supreme Court, we do not deal with other issues.
One of the errors enumerated is the overruling of defendant’s motion for mistrial, the ground being that during the course of his argument to the jury plaintiff’s counsel asserted: “The third element that you have to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Patton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Georgia Power Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McCluskey v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- American Oil Co. v. McCluskeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Seay v. Urban Medical Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Dozier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- American Oil Co. v. McCluskeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.