Legal Opinion

Woods v. Young Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1919No. 15334PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Fletcher, J., entered April 7, 1919, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action by a receiver to avoid an alleged preference obtained by a creditor of an insolvent corporation.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff Woods, as receiver of the Mountain Mill Company, seeks recovery of a money judgment against the defendant, Young Lumber Company, upon the ground that it has received a preference payment as a creditor of the Mountain Mill Company, after the company became insolvent. The lumber company demurred to the receiver’s complaint upon the ground that it did not state a cause of action, which demurrer was sustained by the superior court; and the receiver electing to stand upon his complaint and not plead further, judgment of dismissal was rendered against him, from which he has appealed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olcott v. . Tioga Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Stetson & Post Mill Co. v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. DeGraw v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Gates v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. OppenheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Puget Sound Pulp & Timber Co. v. Clear Lake Cedar Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Herrick v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
  4. Herrick v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API