Haggerty v. Building Investment Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered September 13, 1919, dismissing an action to foreclose a mortgage, tried to tbe court.
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
The facts in this case are not seriously in dispute and may be stated chronologically as follows : On May 27, 1902, the defendant Building Investment Company purchased from the Moore Investment Company, lots 21 and 22, in block 17 of Capital Hill addition No. 2, in the city of Seattle, and on the same day agreed with respondents to sell them the lots so purchased and to erect thereon a residence *639according to certain agreed plans and specifications. The price of the lots being fixed, and respondents to pay in addition thereto the cost of the house to be erected, plus supervisory expenses…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Equitable Building & Loan Ass'n v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
- Bernard v. BensonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Security Trust Co. v. LoewenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Kennard v. MabryTexas Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ellingsen v. Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Ellingsen v. Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Haggerty v. Building Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921