Ellingsen v. Franklin County
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Dissent
Stauffacher, J.*
(dissenting) — I dissent. I agree with the factual background of this matter as stated by the majority. *540I further agree that the sole issue to be determined is which of two statutes, RCW 65.08.070 or RCW 36.80.040, controls. The question is whether these two statutes are in apparent conflict. The trial court found no such conflict.5
To amplify the trial court's memorandum decision, we should make further analysis of the history of each of the statutes in order to ascertain the intent of the Legislature. *541First, let us review the legislative history of the county engineer's…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Paganelli v. SwendsenWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Biles-Coleman Lumber Co. v. LesamizWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Hendricks v. LakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Bremerton Creamery & Produce Co. v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Cunningham v. Norwegian Lutheran Church of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.