Legal Opinion

Southern Counties Gas Co. of Cal. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 15, 1958No. 483-54PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAHY, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation.

The case is before us on an agreed statement of facts. Under authority of the Act of August 18, 1941, 55 Stat. 638, 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 701b, 701e, note, 701m, a flood control project, including a dam, has been erected by the Corps of Engineers, United States Army, to control the flood waters of the Rio Hondo and San Gabriel Rivers at the Whittier Narrows, four miles northwest of Whittier, California. In this connection the United States by condemnation proceedings or negotiations acquired fee title or flowage easements affecting a large area of land and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. R. J. Widen Company v. The United States and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  2. Pete v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Adaman Mutual Water Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. United States v. 40.60 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, Contra Costa County Water DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Steve Winn and Edith Winn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API