Legal Opinion

Brody v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1991No. 1422 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBIERI, Senior Judge.

Stephen S. Brody (Claimant) seeks review of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s denial of his claim petition pursuant to The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §§ 1-1031. Our scope of review, of course, requires us to affirm unless we find any necessary finding of fact unsupported by substantial competent evidence, an error of law or a violation of Claimant’s constitutional rights. Russell v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Volkswagen of America),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Haney v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Marincov v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. U.S. Airways v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Montgomery Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Neidlinger v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Department of Labor & Industry v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Stanner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API