Legal Opinion

Stanner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1992No. 1968 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRY, Senior Judge.

Claimant, Mollie Stanner, surviving widow of Anthony Stanner, deceased, petitions for review of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (the Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision dismissing Claimant’s fatal claim petition filed under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s *95Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §§ 1-1031. The issues raised on appeal are whether Claimant’s decedent sustained “injury arising in the course of his employment” under Section 301(c)(1) of the Act, 77 P.S. § 411(1), where his death was caused by sudden…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Mann v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Tredyffrin-Easttown School District v. BreyerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dandenault v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Carroll v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API