Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 10, 1989No. 88-1593PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORFINGER, Judge.

The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon a plea of nolo contendere after having reserved the right to appeal his motion to suppress evidence. Although not clearly recited in the transcript of the plea hearing, it is obvious that at some time this right had been reserved, because at sentencing, the trial court advised the defendant that “your attorney has reserved the right to appeal on your behalf the suppression hearing.” The motion was found to be dispositive. The State has not challenged the appellant’s right to appeal.

The trial court’s order denying…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HaugeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BooreamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. State v. FreemanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Lowe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. JUSTIN LEE PRICE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  5. State v. JamisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API