Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Jamison

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 18, 1992No. 91-32Published

1DissentHarris, Justice

The majority concludes that the warrant in this case, because of its “dragnet” character, was issued without probable cause. After study, though with some hesitation, I agree. I however dissent from the reversal because I am convinced the warrant was issued by a neutral and detached magistrate and that the officers reasonably relied on it.

I. As the majority recognizes, the United States Supreme Court adopted the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule for cases involving searches conducted by police who reasonably rely upon a warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate. United…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. State v. LampSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. State v. AschenbrennerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  5. State v. BarnettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API