Legal Opinion
Johanssen v. The Bark Eloina
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 1, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Exception to Report of Commissioner.
1Opinion of the Court
Benedict, D. J.
The evidence seems to require the conclusion that 45 fathoms of chain were lost, if any was lost. The evidence as to the value of the chain does not appear to be objected to, and it may be deemed sufficient to warrant the conclusion that the value of 45 fathoms of chain and the anchor was §694.54. As to the demurrage, the allowance of two days is all that the evidence will support. The charge of §10 for a translation of tho log was properly disallowed. It was not a disbursement necessarily resulting from the collision. The charge for the protest is different, because the law of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mailler v. . Express Propeller LineNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- The BalticDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1869
- The EmilieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1870
- In re SmithDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1869
- The G. H. StarbuckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1871
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eastern S. S. Corp. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1919
- The J. G. GilchristDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1909
- The SitkaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1907