Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Griffith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

There are but two questions submitted in this case. The first is as to the validity of an order directing the payment of permanent alimony by the husband, who is given a decree of divorce by default, when such order is made in accordance with and pursuant to an agreement executed by both the husband and the wife.

The cases upon this point to which our attention has been called are not numerous. They are: Stratton v. Stratton, 77 Me. 373 (32 Am. Rep. 779); Prosser v. Prosser, 51 R. I. 58 (150 Atl. 754); Grush v. Grush, 90 Mont. 381 (3 P. (2d) 402); Andrews v. Whitney, 21 Hawaii 264.

In Dunbar v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Stratton v. StrattonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885
  4. Grush v. GrushMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Crumbley v. CrumbleyOregon Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garner v. GarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Gibson v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ackerman v. AckermanWashington Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API