Legal Opinion

(PS) Smith v. City of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 1, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02268Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICIA LYNN SMITH and RASHID No. 2:24-cv-2268-DC-SCR DESHAWN DEARY-SMITH, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. 14 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF 15 SACRAMENTO, SCOTT JONES, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Patricia Lynn Smith (“Smith”) and Rashid Deshawn Deary-Smith (“Deary- 19 Smith”) proceed pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned in accordance with 20 Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiffs allege violations of their 21 constitutional…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API