Legal Opinion

Richard Tucker Associates, Inc. v. Smith

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 8, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLarkin, J.

This is an action for breach of an alleged oral contract in which the appellee (plaintiff below) seeks to recover $10,250 which assertedly represents a commission due for the rendering of certain real estate brokerage services. The appellants (defendants below) responded to the complaint by asserting an affirmative defense alleging that the putative oral agreement, if such there existed, fell within the ambit of the Massachusetts Statute of Frauds. See G.L. c. 259, §1. Consequently, according to the appellants, any “agreement” is therefore unenforceable.

The trial judge rejected this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Martin v. Federal Life Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Robert L. Mercer, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. C. A. Roberts Company, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Nickerson v. President of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Rowland v. HackelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Bartlett v. Mystic River Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldman v. WhittenMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API