Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Whitten

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 7, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFumari, J.

This is an action in contract by the plaintiff, areal estate broker, to recover commissions allegedly due upon the renewal of ten year leases of defendants’ commercial properly by tenants who were originally procured by the plaintiff.

The trial court allowed the defendants’ Dist/Mun. Cts. R. Civ., Rule 56 motion for summaryjudgment on the grounds of insufficient documentation to satisfy the Statute of Frauds.

On appeal to this Division, the plaintiff charges the trial court with error in: (1) hearing the defendant’s summaryjudgment motion despite the absence of the ten-day notice mandated by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Makino, U.S.A., Inc. v. Metlife Capital Credit Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  3. Capital Films Corporation v. Charles Fries Productions, Inc. And American Broadcasting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Mongeau v. BoutelleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Hopkins v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Share Loan Fund of the Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Foundation, Inc. v. UprightMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API