Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. E. I. duPont deNemours & Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 19, 1973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises from a claim by an employee for benefits under a non-occupational Disability Wage Plan. The Superi- or Court ruled that the claim was barred by 10 Del.C. § 8110, * a one-year Statute of Limitations barring claims arising out of “work, labor or personal services performed.” The employee appeals.

The Disability Wage Plan provided for full wages during disability resulting from non-occupational illness or injury for a maximum period of six months. The only eligibility requirement for participation in the Plan was “at least one year of continuous service” with the employer. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  2. Goldman v. Braunstein's, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1968

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Syed v. Hercules Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Avins v. MollDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Shaw v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1978
  4. Syed v. Hercules, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Vassallo v. Haber Electric Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API