Legal Opinion
Gonzales v. Schriro
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 23, 2008No. CV-99-2016-PHX-SMMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEPHEN M. McNAMEE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Competency Determination and to Stay Proceedings. (Dkt. 102.) 1 For the reasons set forth herein, the motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
On November 15, 1999, Petitioner, an Arizona inmate sentenced to death, commenced these proceedings by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (Dkt. 1.) The Court appointed the Federal Public Defender’s Office to represent Petitioner. (Dkt. 8.) On December 21, 1999, the Court issued a case management order setting a deadline for the filing of an amended petition. (Dkt. 17.)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ryan v. Valencia GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Nash v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Carter v. BradshawDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Nash v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009