United States v. 71.41 Ounces Gold Filled Scrap
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
This libel was filed for the forfeiture of gold held in custody by the appellant after seizure by a secret service operative in conjunction with an investigator of the Director of the Mint’s office. Gold Reserve Act, §§ 2(a), 3, 4, title 31 U.S.C.A. §§ 441-443. The act provides that any gold withheld, acquired, transported, melted or treated, imported, exported or earmarked or held in custody in violation of the provisions of the act or regulations issued thereunder ■ or license issued pursuant thereto, shall be forfeited to the United States.
By affidavits it was shown…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Matthews v. CorreaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- United States v. BellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943
- United States v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.