Legal Opinion

United States v. Vassar

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 2002No. 01-30235; D.C. No. CR-01-00052-RPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Jerome Vassar pled guilty to bank fraud and fraudulent use of another person’s identification on a Friday; his trial was set to begin the following Monday. He challenges his thirty-seven month sentence because he did not receive a one-level decrease in his offense level for timely notifying authorities of his intention to plead guilty. He also claims that the district court erred in counting a criminal history point for a prior state adult diversionary conviction.

We affirm.

I. Timeliness of guilty plea

Vassar claims that because he pled guilty before trial, the district court should…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Bobby Lee HopperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Daniel David KimpleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Lemont D. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime VILLASENOR-CESAR, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Alfonso HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Of Washington v. David Brent HaggardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API