Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Druecker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1896No. 1,778PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Prom the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

Appellee brought this action in the court below, to recover of the appellant for an alleged balance due for cement sold and delivered by appellee to appellant. The appellant filed a counterclaim, setting up an implied warranty of the cement. A demurrer was sustained to this pleading, and this ruling is the first error assigned.

It is alleged, in this pleading, that the cement described in the complaint is the kind usually sold by the appellee to construct cement-paved sidewalks, and that it was purchased by the appellant for the purpose of constructing and building cement-paved sidewalks in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merchants' & Mechanics' Savings Bank v. FrazeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Bushman v. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fitzmaurice v. PuterbaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Hercules Powder Co. v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. J. P. Smith Shoe Co. v. Curme-Feltman Shoe Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Oil-Well Supply Co. v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Edwards Manufacturing Co. v. StoopsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API