Mann v. Corrigan
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Cowley District Court. Action brought by Mann against Corrigan and the Southern Kansas & Western Railroad Company, to recover $301.90 for work done in the construction of the railroad of said company. May 10, 1881, the district court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition, which ruling Mann brings here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
*195The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
This case comes to us on error from the ruling of the district court of.Cowley county, sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition.
The plaintiff sought to charge the railroad company for failing to take the bond required by § 35, ch. 84, Comp. Laws of 1879. Counsel for defendant in error claim that the ruling of the district court must be sustained on two grounds: First, because it is not affirmatively shown that the labor on account of which this action is brought is of a kind within the protection of the statute; and second, because the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McAunich v. Mississippi & Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Deppe v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- M. K. & T. Railway Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- D. L. Wells & Co. v. MehlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
3Cited by7 opinions
- Griffith v. StuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- J. B. McCrary Co. v. Dade County ex rel. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Gilmore v. WestermanWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Lohr & Trapnell v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Leidigh & Havens Lumber Co. v. BollingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.