Legal Opinion
Bohn v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 7, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The motion is to vacate an attachment of the defendant’s property.
The action was originally brought in the New York Supreme Court to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained in Virginia. The plaintiff is a resident of New York and was resident here at the time the cause of action arose. The defendant is a Virginia corporation which operates a railroad in interstate commerce; it has no tracks in New York, and it is not doing business here. The plaintiff attached property of the defendant located within the district and caused service of summons to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- International Milling Co. v. Columbia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. TerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- White v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Wilcox v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Jacobowitz v. ThomsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Stone v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Weiss v. Southern Pacific Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1940