Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fedorek

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 2008No. 25 WAP 2007PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice McCAFFERY.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the Commonwealth must prove that an offender acted with intent to cause substantial “public” harm or serious “public” inconvenience in order to grade the offender’s disorderly conduct conviction as a misdemeanor of the third degree pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 5503(b). Because we determine that 18 Pa.C.S. § 5503(b) requires the Commonwealth to prove in a third-degree misdemeanor disorderly conduct prosecution that the offender acted with intent to cause substantial harm or serious inconvenience, rather than to prove…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LutesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. ReynoldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. HockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FranklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. MobleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. RahmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. VeonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. RenchenskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API