Legal Opinion

Stottler v. Meyers Printing Company

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 1999No. CX-99-763PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

After a reemployment insurance judge denied benefits to an employee, a commissioner’s representative unilaterally ordered review of the decision. Without conducting a review, the representative withdrew the order after the time for appeal had expired. The employee appealed from the reemployment insurance judge’s order. The commissioner dismissed the appeal as untimely. We hold that the commissioner is equitably estopped from withdrawing the order for review and that he must comply with the mandate in Minn.Stat. § 268.105, subd. 3(b) (1998).

FACTS

Relator Heidi Stottler…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Transamerica Insurance Group v. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Brenner v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Albachten v. BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Talberg v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Hansen v. C.W. Mears, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Halvorson v. County of AnokaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Kennedy v. American Paper Recycling Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Waletich Corp. v. Commissioner of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API