Commonwealth v. Reinhart
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*594OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
In this appeal,1 we are presented with three issues arising from the grant of a nolle prosequi: (1) is Pa.R.Crim.P. 314(a),2 which provides that a trial court *595may, upon request of the Commonwealth, grant a nolle prosequi “notwithstanding the objection of any person,” valid under the Federal Constitution; (2) was appellant denied due process of law under the Federal Constitution by the trial court’s grant of a nolle prosequi; and (3) was the trial court’s grant of a nolle prosequi an abuse of discretion.
On February 1, 1972, after several hours of drinking…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Townsend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. HudsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.