Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Reinhart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1976No. 236PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*594OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

In this appeal,1 we are presented with three issues arising from the grant of a nolle prosequi: (1) is Pa.R.Crim.P. 314(a),2 which provides that a trial court *595may, upon request of the Commonwealth, grant a nolle prosequi “notwithstanding the objection of any person,” valid under the Federal Constitution; (2) was appellant denied due process of law under the Federal Constitution by the trial court’s grant of a nolle prosequi; and (3) was the trial court’s grant of a nolle prosequi an abuse of discretion.

On February 1, 1972, after several hours of drinking…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Townsend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. HudsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API