Legal Opinion
Dodge v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 8, 1934No. Civ. No. 9686PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.
Proceedings brought to compel the superior court to proceed with the trial of a case after making the following order in response to a motion to abate: “That the above action abate pending the final determination of said action No. 259-996 in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, and in the event said action is finally terminated and adjudicated in favor of the defendants in said action, the defendants in this action be allowed to amend their answer to plead such judgment in bar of this action. ” It is urged that the pleadings and files of said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hatch v. SpoffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
- Sulz v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Baker v. Eilers Music Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- McCormick v. GrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Beneke v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by15 opinions
- Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Evans v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Rivermeadows, Inc. v. ZWAANSHOEK HOLDING AND FINANCIERINGWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Mercer Casualty Co. v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Mills v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.