Legal Opinion

Brant v. Nugent

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 27, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This motion is to strike the bill for want of equity. For the purposes of this motion the defendant admits it to be true as alleged, that he and the complainant Mrs. Brant, being tenants in common, in equal shares of one and thirty-four hundredths acres of land in the Newark meadows, he filed a bill for partition, and, complainants' solicitor consenting thereto, a decree for sale was entered. The selling master made the statutory publication, and on the day set adjourned the sale one week, no one being present, and on the adjourned day struck off the property to the defendant for $2,000, he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hale v. . ClausonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Breitman v. JaehnalNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  3. Mutual Life Insurance v. GoddardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leppert v. LeppertNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  2. Mosher v. Van BuskirkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  3. Colquhoun (Eliz.) Est. v. Colquhoun (Robt.) Est.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API