Rich v. Hackel

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered on or about November 19, *3171993, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs cross-motion to disqualify the law firm of Varet & Fink from representing the Clarendon defendants in this litigation, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

While we do not pass on the issue of whether plaintiff has standing to maintain the causes of action asserted in the complaint, it is clear that the IAS Court’s denial of plaintiffs cross-motion to disqualify the law firm of Varet & Fink ("VF”) from representing the Clarendon defendants in this…