Legal Opinion
Armco, Inc. v. United Steelworkers, Local 169
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 7, 2002No. Nos. 00-3609, 00-3610, 00-3611PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHN, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case arises out of a labor dispute at the Mansfield, Ohio facility of Armco, Inc., a steel manufacturer. In July 1999, Arm-co filed an action in state court1 claiming that the defendants-appellants, United Steelworkers of America, AFL CIO; Local 169, United Steelworkers of America AFL CIO; Billy D. Collins; Dan Martin; and Mark E. Robertson, (collectively “the Unions”) breached the terms of a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) in violation of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 301. The Unions removed the case to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. StottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Raymond RobinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Armco, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 169, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Billy D. Collins, Dan Martin, and Mark E. Robertson v. City of Mansfield, Lydia Reid, and John FullerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Michigan American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees Council 25, Local 1640 v. Matrix Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Thomas v. WoodDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021