Legal Opinion

Kozak v. Berger

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1964Published

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew J. Jasen, J.

Defendant seeks to preclude the plaintiff for failure to comply with defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars (CPLR 3042, subd. [d]).

Paragraph “Sixth” of plaintiff’s complaint alleges certain violations of ordinances and statutes by defendant herein and pursuant thereto, defendant did demand of plaintiff under para*120graph two of the bill of particulars, “ a statement of each and every statute and ¡ordinance which plaintiff claims to have been violated by the defendant. ’ ’

That in response to said demand, the plaintiff set forth the following: " 2. Plaintiff will rely upon the Judge’s charge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rotondi v. VaughanNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Levine v. RosenmanNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hanlon v. GearyNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Rubin v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API