Legal Opinion

Levine v. Rosenman

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoyne, J.

■ This is a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the individual plaintiffs through the alleged,negligence of the defendants. The corporate defendant by separate motions seeks to preclude each plaintiff for failure to comply with defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars. Under the items designated “ 1 ” of the notices of motion, each plaintiff shall set forth every specification of negligence relied upon. The omnibus statement “ * * * that said defendants were careless, reckless and negligent in other respects ” is improper and is disallowed. Under the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aker v. KellyNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Rubin v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Kozak v. BergerNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API