Greif Brothers Cooperage Corporation v. Sawyer
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
Appellee, complainant below, and appellant, respondent below, are conterminous landowners. The controversy arose over a disputed boundary line. The evidence was heard ore tenus in the trial court and from .a decree establishing the boundary line as contended for by the appellee, appellant has prosecuted this appeal.
Appellant contends that the southeasterly boundary line of its property and the northwesterly boundary of appellee’s property is along a public county road as it now exists. Appellant’s claim is based upon ad*514verse possession. Appellee claims that the boundary line…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Salter v. CobbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Guy v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Jacksonville Public Service Corp. v. Calhoun Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Whitlow v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Dunn v. FletcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. WiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Sims v. SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Derrill v. DillardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Kittrell v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Huey v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.