Legal Opinion

Cech v. Schultz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1937No. 26283PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Neither in this nor in the appellate court have counsel for appellant challenged the regularity of the official proceedings culminating in the forfeited land sale for the payment of delinquent taxes; however, the appellant attacks the finding of the board under Section 5718-1, General Code, contending that it is arbitrary and that the board committed a gross abuse of discretion in failing to submit the delinquent premises to sale by way of foreclosure.

In his petition to quiet title,'the appellant offered to pay the appellee the amount of money paid by him at the tax sale, together with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Leigh v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ross v. FrankoOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Dubin v. GreenwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Malia v. Wright, Treas.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API