Legal Opinion
Rawlings v. Casey
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 15, 1903No. 2315PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of Teller County.
1Opinion of the CourtGunter, J.
This was an adverse suit. Judgment for plaintiff.
1. The complaint does not aver that the adverse claim was filed in the land office within sixty days from the commencement of publication of notice of application for patent. It is said that in this the complaint fails to state facts sufficient' to constitute a cause of action.
We have decided such averment unnecessary to the complaint stating a cause of action. — Pa. Min. Co. v. Bales, 18 Colo. App. 108, 70 Pac. 444.
2. The court below dismissed the ease for violation of one of its rules. Later, upon hearing, it reinstated the case. This is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marr v. WetzelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1876
- Blakney v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Haley v. ElliottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- McKenzie v. MurphySupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Gerspach v. BarhyteColorado Court of Appeals · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hain v. MattesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- Miller v. East Denver Municipal Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928