Legal Opinion
In Re Lee Way Holding Co.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 19, 1989No. Bankruptcy 2-85-00661PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON PEPSICO, INC.’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COHEN, MALAD & HAHN
DONALD E. CALHOUN, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of PepsiCo, Inc. (“PepsiCo”), a creditor herein, to disqualify the law firm of Cohen, Malad & Hahn (formerly known as Dillon & Cohen, and hereinafter referred to as “CMH”), as co-counsel for the debtor, Lee Way Holding Company (“debtor”). PepsiCo also demands that CMH return all fees paid, and that it be denied future compensation. This matter came on for oral hearing, following which the Court took this matter under advisement…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In the Matter of Arlan's Department Stores, Inc., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- In Re RobertsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
- Baker v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ducey v. Doherty (In Re Ducey)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
- In Re American Printers & Lithographers, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- In Re Office Products of America, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1992
- In Re Siliconix, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
- In Re BegunUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.